Conference Review Policy
The submissions are subject to a double-blind peer review process by at least two reviewers with expertise in the relevant subject area.
 
Authors will be notified about their submission results in three weeks.

Submissions will be evaluated based on the abstract/proposal.
 
Based on the reviewers’ comments, papers are accepted, rejected or accepted with revision.
 
If the comments are not addressed well in the improved paper, then the paper is sent back to the authors to make further revisions.
 
Authors whose papers are rejected may submit papers for the next call for papers after the necessary revisions are made.
 
Reviewing Criteria used by the reviewers:
  • Degree of Originality                    
  • Introduction                    
  • Methods                           
  • Findings                             
  • Proper Use of Language                            
  • Relevance of Title and Content                              
  • Is submission publishable?                       
  • Comments

Supported by
IOWA
Indiana University
University of Northern Colorado
International Society for Technology, Education and Science
Participating Countries